I think the most interesting thing about posting online, blogs, etc, is the privacy aspect. What do you share? What do you withhold? Every blogger alive tries to present themselves as intelligent, well-adjusted, sane, knowledgeable, etc. If they indeed have weaknesses, vices, or foibles, such characteristics are only hinted at in a kind of universally understood mock-humility, i.e. â€œI am immensely clever but also human, therefore I am supposedly better and more trustworthy than someone who is just immensely clever and uber-human.â€
Is there an honest way to toe the line between giving way too much personal info and complete, obvious santization or psuedo-glorification? I donâ€™t know. There is a array of possible techniques, from the confessional blogger that relates their sex life in lurid detail to the airbrushed political candidate that neglects past sins. Everyone tiptoes through the minefield – or dashes forward – in their own unique way. The â€œsecond persona,â€ the authorâ€™s presentation of himself or herself, is pushed to the brink by the web. Identity dissipiates in a fashion a mere book or speech could only dream of.
I certainly withhold a lot. I donâ€™t talk about my personal life much, save mild allusions. I donâ€™t talk about my professional life beyond what I would reveal in a casual conversation with another educator. The dangers are myriad and need no elaboration. This removes a great deal of juicy material, of course, and creates what I like to call an â€œiceberg effectâ€ where additional depth to any given utterance can be assumed. But the most interesting and most revealing things are still stripped away, much like a telephone signal is clipped at the top and the bottom, leaving only a bland middle. The rest is left to the imagination, or the careful assembly of a skilled close reader.
Eh. Another one of those classic rhetorical problems that has no solution, but bears awareness, discussion, and attention well.