An old friend of mine died recently. He was young, late forties. We were not close or anything. In fact, I only met him in person once; we knew each other through online roleplaying from years and years ago, well before MMOs, when text-based MUSHes were still popular. This would be the late nineties, when I was an undergraduate and shortly thereafter. I can’t count the hours we spent making up stories during that time.
I remember his arrival on the MUSH as a newbie very distinctly – this was AmberMUSH, for the curious – as I happened to be one of the people who greeted him. It was clear very quickly that he didn’t need to be shown the ropes – he was good out of the box, a very selfless and skilled roleplayer already. I learned more from him over the years than the other way around. He was older and gave me some pretty good life advice, as well, on occasion, which I didn’t listen too very well; I was young and stupid then, and only older and slightly smarter now. I think I would have been happier back then had I emulated him more closely.
I got back in touch with him a year ago, when I ran into and recognized his old nickname online; too briefly, of course. He had kept on RPing in a multitude of forms, whereas I had stopped around ’00, but we still had mutually excellent taste in games.
I have to say that I wasn’t expecting to hear about his death anytime soon – I figured I wouldn’t start getting news like that until I hit 70, at least. My RPing days were bittersweet overall, but he was a very bright and friendly spot in an often dark expanse.
Well, two days of heavy activity have resulted in me hurting my back, no matter how much I quoted that particular SNL skit. Like the mighty Hercules, I could lift a smaller boulder, but screw that one. Fortunately, Friday is a faculty assembly, where as far as I know, there is no boulder-lifting; then again, there might be, as I haven’t been to one before. If so, I plan to lie flat and let it fix itself.
I had a pretty good day yesterday in terms of productivity. I finished a longstanding article revision, graded a whole class of papers, and even worked in cutting and trimming the lawn. I also spent some time thinking about a completely new article – imagine that. It’s been a long semester.
I’m moving my office today. This is move #3 since I came to UHD in Fall 2009, and my fourth different office. Hopefully it will be the last for awhile.
Another thrashing. As always, it’s a pleasure to read someone who really knows their stuff.
I was out of town much of last week to attend my grandfather’s funeral. He was 87. He was buried in the new (not the old) veteran’s cemetery in Memphis, as he served in WWII. The service was very appropriate; my cousin gave the eulogy. Life is short, and our bodies are frail.
While we were in Memphis, I saw Bela Fleck and the Flecktones. Bluegrass jazz/fusion really isn’t my thing, but that was four (actually five) very, very talented instrumentalists on stage.
Everyone encounters their doppleganger eventually. I’m tempted to use him for my faculty photo.
Another book review, this time Ready Player One. It’s a recent young adult book that H had us listen to in the car on the way to work. We ended up reading the last half of it. No offense, Wil Wheaton as narrator.
My feelings on the book are mixed. On one hand, the subject matter – early 80s culture and gaming – is delightful, since I, too, was growing up at the time and got my first computer in 1984, much like James Halliday. And there are some very clever moments. However, I feel there are some serious problems worth dissecting, and I preface the following comments with the usual SPOILER ALERT.
First off, the novel’s central contest is based mostly around the mastery of coin-op titles. If you know Joust, Black Tiger, and Tempest cold, you’re basically worthy to win, which seems an odd value judgment for even a reclusive billionaire to make. Where are the moral tests? Halliday seems concerned with the right kind of person taking control, but he also seems wedded to the notion that if he can only force the countless millions of gunter contestees to be lesser clones of himself circa 1989, they will automatically become worthy human beings as well. And Wade never questions this – never wonders, bright fellow that he is, if this contest isn’t flawed from the get-go. Later on we learn that Og is the contest’s failsafe of a sort, but this doesn’t prevent a innocent kid from dying, or pretty much any of the Sixers’ progress. In short, the contest bred more evil than good. Being a product of the ’80s myself, I have to say, regrettably, that all that stuff doesn’t make you a better person than average, and manual dexterity at Pac-Man has limited value.
Second, the true beginning of the novel is probably when Wade enters the tomb. Everything up to that point – about a third of the book – is primarily exposition. The book only flows when the contest is progressing. As such, all that slow stuff in the beginning – the setup of the contest, Wade’s home, his school – could be gradually filled in later in a more streamlined fashion. This is a first novel, admittedly, and simultaneous plot/exposition is hard, but it can be done. The scene with the lich is interesting enough by itself to carry the reader forward into that material.
Third, the entire section where Wade gives up his apartment is completely and utterly unbelievable. Nothing he has done as a character up to that point points toward him being capable of it – again, immersion in ’80s culture doesn’t make you a better or stronger person – and he does it without even knowing if the codes he brings work. Also, the reader is left in the dark for two chapters after getting used to knowing everything Wade thinks, which is a big no-no.
Finally, the ultimate ‘lesson’ or ‘character growth’ moment of the book is that Wade finally escapes the Oasis and rejoins us blokes in the real world, getting the girl and saving the world(s) in traditional fashion. I know this is young adult stuff, but I thought it would have been more realistic, given what had been presented thus far, if both the real Halliday (as represented by his avatar at the end) and the real Artemis had proven disappointing, or if the contest had been a joke, with no prize or a far lesser prize – or, even, if Wade had lost all his friends in his obsessive quest to win (my preference). There are hints and false starts to all those possible endings in the book, but we got the least meaningful one.
Now let’s be fair. There are counterarguments. Halliday does throw everyone for a loop when he requires the last gate to be opened by three people, suggesting that only someone with similarly-skilled friends willing to share the prize can enter (although you only get to know this if you can play a certain Rush song on guitar during a very limited one-shot window of time). And Wade does seem to be a basically good fellow, so Halliday’s contest ‘worked’ in producing an appropriate winner, deus ex machina in the form of Og notwithstanding. The obsessive attention to detail that creates master players of Joust is in the end a symptom of highly refined taste, which leads to superior morality – after all, nearly all of the games Wade plays are good vs. evil with the player firmly on the side of good, with bravery, chivalry, and selflessness all positive traits displayed in the media as well. This could have been more nakedly pointed out, however.
I finished my first playthrough of Crusader Kings II last night. 1066 to 1453, starting as the Duke of Munster with two counties. I ended up as the King of Ireland, Scotland, Brythain (Wales and Brittany), and England, plus most of western France and a chunk of Iberia. My self-imposed goal was to control all the of the British Isles – the last county came over in 1440. Whew!
The Paradox AI made a total, glorious mess of history. The Franks let the Moors up, as far as Dijou, save for my Irish, who nicely held half of France for them. The empire in Constantinople took over the Golden Horde by marriage and picked up half the map. Every crusade was shattered on the shores of Egypt. The Mongols got to Asia Minor twice, only to be pushed back.
I’m undecided about what to try next – either somewhere in Spain, or somewhere in Italy. In any case, the game is a timesink, but who cares. Games are never a waste of time for me. They’re the point.
Normally Dowd gets her point across through satire. This is probably the first time I’ve simply seen her say her mind with a minimum of the usual technique. Now we all know that the SCOTUS is not really impartial, or objective, or just – anything like what its ideals point toward. But it’s refreshing, occasionally, for someone to simply say it.